PSYCHOANALISE THIS PARAGRAPH AND MAKE COMENTS,IS WRITE BY PEOPLE WHO PRETEND TO "CREATE COMPUTERS WITH ETHICAL ISSUES" _________________________________________
“the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that one will be able to speak of machines thinking without expecting to be contradicted”.__________________________
Today, it is not uncommon to hear people talking about their computers being
_________________________________________
“confused”, or taking a long time to do something because they’re “thinking about it”. But even if we are stricter about what counts as a thinking machine, it’s closer to reality than many people think.
machine with instructions to “make people happy”, for example, might just decide to do the job with electrodes in brains; so only by addressing one of the greatest problems in philosophy can we be sure we’ll have a machine that understands what it means to be “good___________________________________
On aggregate level, these changes are a good thing. If the work of millions of people is covered by algorithms, then output goes up, hours worked go down, and we move one step closer to a Jetsons-style utopia.____________________________
In the end, it will be OK?
Assuming we avoid the superintelligent AIs wiping us out as an afterthought, manage to automate a large proportion of our jobs without creating mass unemployment and societal unrest, and navigate the tricky boundaries of what personhood entails in a world where we can code passable simulacra of humans, then yes, it should be fine....
________________________________________
So, all we have to do is program in ethics and we’ll be fine?
Well, not quite. Even if we manage to not get wiped out by malicious AI, there’s still the issue of how society adapts to the increasing capability of artificial intelligence.____________________________
Once the trading has affected the market, it might be written up for Forbes by Narrative Science, which uses algorithms to replace financial journalists. After all, most business stories follow a common template, and the data is already available in a structured format, so why waste time getting people involved at all?"____________________________________
Sunday, November 30, 2014
HOW FAR A "LONELY MIND"....CAN REACH BESIDES REPLACE HUMANS FOR ROBOTICS!!
PSYCHOANALISE THIS PARAGRAPH AND MAKE COMENTS,IS WRITE BY PEOPLE WHO PRETEND TO "CREATE COMPUTERS WITH ETHICAL ISSUES" _________________________________________
“the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that one will be able to speak of machines thinking without expecting to be contradicted”.__________________________
Today, it is not uncommon to hear people talking about their computers being
_________________________________________
“confused”, or taking a long time to do something because they’re “thinking about it”. But even if we are stricter about what counts as a thinking machine, it’s closer to reality than many people think.
machine with instructions to “make people happy”, for example, might just decide to do the job with electrodes in brains; so only by addressing one of the greatest problems in philosophy can we be sure we’ll have a machine that understands what it means to be “good___________________________________
On aggregate level, these changes are a good thing. If the work of millions of people is covered by algorithms, then output goes up, hours worked go down, and we move one step closer to a Jetsons-style utopia.____________________________
In the end, it will be OK?
Assuming we avoid the superintelligent AIs wiping us out as an afterthought, manage to automate a large proportion of our jobs without creating mass unemployment and societal unrest, and navigate the tricky boundaries of what personhood entails in a world where we can code passable simulacra of humans, then yes, it should be fine....
________________________________________
So, all we have to do is program in ethics and we’ll be fine?
Well, not quite. Even if we manage to not get wiped out by malicious AI, there’s still the issue of how society adapts to the increasing capability of artificial intelligence.____________________________
Once the trading has affected the market, it might be written up for Forbes by Narrative Science, which uses algorithms to replace financial journalists. After all, most business stories follow a common template, and the data is already available in a structured format, so why waste time getting people involved at all?"____________________________________
Systematic is replace the informative network for information to cause"an efect" to control our mind,the same pictures same article with diferent worldly formats publish over and over ,prety much like robots that dont think for themselves but. Offer what is programme for........because a computer never will replace the perfection of human brain,ITS CREATOR!
ReplyDelete