HOW HONEST THE JUDICIARY AND FAMILY COURT SYSTEM IS

By neri

DO YOU KNOW HOW IS BEEN HANDLE YOUR RIGHTS IN THE STATE,COUNTRY,CITY WERE YOU LIVE!

I will like to share this info that it call my attention regarding the NEW LAWMAKERS DECISIONS REGARDING COURT WITNESSES DECLARATIONS BEFORE TRAIL;

TEXAS has been commit innumerable violation BY MANIPULATE THE FREEDOM AND POWER THEY HAVE BEHIND “THE BIG HAMMER”……corruption in another hand for the personal enrichment and interest on the people involve…. FAMILY COURTS DECISIONS PUT OUR FAMILIES IN DANGER FOR 3RD. PEOPLE TO HAVE POWER OVER THE RIGHTS OF OUR KIDS, SCIENTIFIC PROJECTS WITH THE GOAL OF EXPERIMENTATION WITH HUMANS IS ONE…..LETS FIGHT THIS CRIMINAL SYSTEM!!!

THE DUTY OF A FEDERAL PERSECUTOR ,10 THE STEPS THEY “SUPPOSEDLY HAVE TO FOLLOW”;
1 INVESTIGATION

2 DESITION TO CHARGE

Sometimes, a prosecutor will present the evidence to an impartial group of citizens, called “Grand Jurors.” Witnesses may be called to testify, evidence shown to the Grand Jury and a simplified outline of the case presented to the Grand Jury members. What the Grand Jury does is listen to the prosecutor.

The members then meet secretly and vote on whether they believe that enough evidence exists to charge the person with a crime.

A Grand Jury also has the option of telling the prosecutor that the evidence and witnesses that he/she presented was insufficient to trigger an appearance of a crime, and as a result “no indictment” would come from the Grand Jury. All proceedings and statements made before a Grand Jury are sealed, meaning that only the people in the room have knowledge about who said what about whom.

The Grand Jury is a constitutional requirement, (meaning it is written in our constitution) that exists so that a group of citizens, who do not know the defendant, the judge, the prosecutor or anyone else in the room can make an unbias decision as to the existence of enough evidence to charge a defendant with a crime.

After the defendant is charged, he can either hire an attorney or choose to be represented by an attorney provided by the Government—a “public defender”—at no charge. The defendant’s attorney is referred to as the “defense attorney”. He assists the defendant in understanding the law and the facts of the case, and represents the “charged person” just as the prosecutor will represent the Government.

AFTER THAT INITIAL-HEARING, PRE-TRAIL, WITTINESS,PLEA AGREEMENT , MOTION IN LIMITED, ETC….

WHY THE LAW MAKERS ARE THINKING ON CHANGE THIS PROCEEDING;
OBIOUSLY CORRUPTION FROM THE PARTICIPANTS AS “GRAND JURORS” THAT HAVE BEEN WRONGLY PERSECUTE INOCENT PEOPLE AND WHO’S QUALIFICATIONS AREN’T APPROPIATE TO BE PART OF THE COURT STUFF SINCE IS BEEN PROFF THAT SOME TIMES THEY BEEN SEEN THE DEFENDANT before ,
OR KNOWING THEM BY ANY PUBLIC VIAS AND PROCEED ACORDING TO THEIR PERSONAL PREFERENCES NOT ACORDING TO THE LAW

….cops, attorney at law, and other people with personal interest take advantage of the failure of this corrupt process NAMED “GRAN JURORS”

WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE NAMES OF THE ONES’ INVOLVE ON THE REMOVAL OF BONES FROM OUR BODIES, BRAIN EXPERIMENTATION, AND THE IRRESPONSIBILITY OF THE ONES’ ON THE HIGH CHAIR THAT PARTICIPATING ON THIS HUMANITY CRIME….